Health Insurance Expansion Research Paper

/in /by

In a 4- to 6-page paper, address the following:

  • Analyze the rationale for health insurance expansion. Include how health insurance expansion relates to the problem of adverse selection.
  • Evaluate economic implications of health insurance expansion in the United States. Include, specifically, how health insurance expansions might impact health care organizations in your own state or region.

Note: The paper should be 4–6 pages, not including the title and reference pages. Your Assignment must be written in standard edited English. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this module’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources, as appropriate. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure that your in-text citations and reference list are correct. See the rubric for additional requirements related to research and scholarly writing.

EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR
Discussion Posting Content

22 (55%) – 24 (60%)

Discussion posting demonstrates an excellentunderstanding of allof the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.

19 (47.5%) – 21 (52.5%)

Discussion posting demonstrates a goodunderstanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.

17 (42.5%) – 18 (45%)

Discussion posting demonstrates a fairunderstanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

0 (0%) – 16 (40%)

Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understandingof the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
Peer Feedback and Interaction

8 (20%) – 8 (20%)

The feedback postings and responses to questions are excellent and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.

7 (17.5%) – 7 (17.5%)

The feedback postings and responses to questions are good but may not fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.

6 (15%) – 6 (15%)

The feedback postings and responses to questions only partially contribute to the quality of interaction by offering insufficient constructive critique or suggestions, shallow questions, or poor quality additional resources.

0 (0%) – 5 (12.5%)

Student does not interact with peers (0 points), or the feedback postings and responses to questions do not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critique, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.
Writing

8 (20%) – 8 (20%)

Postings are wellorganized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.

7 (17.5%) – 7 (17.5%)

Postings are mostlyconsistent with graduate-level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.

6 (15%) – 6 (15%)

Postings are somewhat belowgraduate-level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing.

0 (0%) – 5 (12.5%)

Postings are well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.