In your opinion (rooted in, and informed by, peer-reviewed academic journal articles), which is the most appropriate lens through which we should and/or should not study the Modern Middle East? Explain why, in details. (The remaining 2 pages)

Part 1: Compile a mental list of FIVE issues, concepts, or facts that you learned from the readings (preferably something you knew little, or nothing about) and engage in a critical examination of these five, citing appropriate peer-reviewed articles to strengthen your argument(s). In a sense, you will find a common theme around which you would write a 2-page essay, making an argument surrounding these five concepts, issues, or facts. This is NOT a reflection paper! It’s about critical engagement in the texts that you have read. Do not just list 5 concepts and define each, but rather provide a narrative, informed by peer-reviewed articles.

Part 2: In your opinion (rooted in, and informed by, peer-reviewed academic journal articles), which is the most appropriate lens through which we should and/or should not study the Modern Middle East? Explain why, in details. (The remaining 2 pages)

Please cite and use footnotes/endnotes or in text citation (be consistent) when referring to specific pages, ideas, and quotes you read about.

Note: Please use an established citation guide (Chicago, APA, or MLA…etc.) Finally, please include a bibliography (not included in the page limit mentioned above). Feel free to consult with a librarian, and visit the writing center if you need help. Note: Do not ever cite Wikipedia! Or a random website online. Peer-reviewed journal articles are always the best to cite for obvious reasons.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.