Which would be more reasonable and more feasible: extending benefits to those who have other illnesses or withdrawing them from those who need kidney dialysis?

250 words each part with refernce

  1. Is it ethical for the federal government to pay the costs of kidney dialysis for all patients, regardless of age or income, as it now does, but not to pay the costs of other illnesses? Which would be more reasonable and more feasible: extending benefits to those who have other illnesses or withdrawing them from those who need kidney dialysis?

Chapter13

Reference

Weitz, R. (2010). The sociology of health, illness, and healthcare: A critical approach. (6th ed.). Boston, MA.: Cengage.

  1. Is “cosmetic pharmacology” ethical? Does the fact that it is only available to some individuals make it any more or less ethical? Could cosmetic pharmacology eventually increase social inequality?

Chapter 13

Reference

Weitz, R. (2010). The sociology of health, illness, and healthcare: A critical approach. (6th ed.). Boston, MA.: Cengage.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.