HCM460 CSU Global The Role of Networking in Professional Life

/in /by

Develop a well-written paper that includes the following:

  • Describe the role that networking can play in your professional life.
  • Explain what you’re doing to keep your “professional brand” consistent across social and professional platforms.
  • List at least two professional organizations within your degree field and describe the value you could gain by becoming a member of these organizations.
  • Discuss the steps you could take to developing a professional connection with a mentor or career coach.

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

Review the Module 7 Critical Thinking Rubric for full details on how you will be graded on this assignment.

Rubric

HCM460 Mod 7 CT

HCM460 Mod 7 CT
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

 12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

 9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

 6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

 8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

 6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

 4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

 8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.

 6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format.

 4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

 8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

 6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

 4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 75.0

Next