Distribution Planning

Discuss current new media distribution sites that independent media creators use to distribute and monetize their works


Describe traditional media distribution channels that complement new media channels

Describe the monetization methods of new media distribution channels


Identify metrics to measure success and set financial goals for a new media distribution plan

Compare various new media distribution channels in relation to their ability to monetize a product or service.

Distribution Planning

Discuss current new media distribution sites that independent media creators use to distribute and monetize their works


Describe traditional media distribution channels that complement new media channels

Describe the monetization methods of new media distribution channels


Identify metrics to measure success and set financial goals for a new media distribution plan

Compare various new media distribution channels in relation to their ability to monetize a product or service.

Youtube as a new media

 

Discuss how YouTube has changed the media distribution industry

 

Discuss the usage of media channels other than YouTube

 

Describe which types of content/media could be created to launch a successful YouTube channel

 

Identify the specifications for creating a YouTube channel

 

Analyze the various ways to monetize a YouTube channel

 

Describe the methods within YouTube for directing viewers to monetized content

 

Evaluate the use of other new media and traditional media distribution channels to maximize the monetization of a YouTube channel

Technical Choices and Distribution Planning

·      Explain why technical specifications affect all media creation decisions 

·      Analyze how technical specifications directly impact distribution planning

 

·      Define key terms such as format, codec, aspect ratio, bit rate, and frame rate for media 

·      Explain which formats, codecs, aspect ratios, bit rates, and frame rates are most widely utilized 

·      Explain why the selection of media format matters and how it is used in new media distribution 

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS You have been chosen to represent APUS at an important Public Administration conference. You are going to present on the impact of the Human Relations Era school of thought on Administrative Theory. GUIDELINES: Create a presentation using PowerPoint, or similar presentation software (several freeware versions available such as Knovio) in which you explain the overall significance of this set of theories, and then in which you go into detail on the contributions of Follett, Mayo, Maslow, McGregor and Mosher. Instead of using biographical information, include how each added to the theories of public administration. Be sure to draw connections to the real world, support with examples and cite your sources properly using APA. Multimedia tools encouraged! Include at least five academic references in support of your presentation. Use the online library to do this using APA format. HINTS: Use this venue to demonstrate your understanding of their theories and their contributions to the field. Don’t just write paragraphs and put them on slides. Prepare a presentation using bullet points and either speakers’ notes or an audio inclusion. USE YOUR OWN WORDS. Don’t just copy and paste information from sources—it will show up in the Turnitin report.

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

You have been chosen to represent APUS at an important Public Administration conference.  You are going to present on the impact of the Human Relations Era school of thought on Administrative Theory.

 

GUIDELINES:

Create a presentation using PowerPoint, or similar presentation software (several freeware versions available such as Knovio) in which you explain the overall significance of this set of theories, and then in which you go into detail on the contributions of Follett, Mayo, Maslow, McGregor and Mosher.

Instead of using biographical information, include how each added to the theories of public administration. Be sure to draw connections to the real world, support with examples and cite your sources properly using APA. Multimedia tools encouraged!

Include at least five academic references in support of your presentation.  Use the online library to do this using APA format.

HINTS:

Use this venue to demonstrate your understanding of their theories and their contributions to the field.

Don’t just write paragraphs and put them on slides. Prepare a presentation using bullet points and either speakers’ notes or an audio inclusion.

USE YOUR OWN WORDS.  Don’t just copy and paste information from sources—it will show up in the Turnitin report.

Assignment Instructions Now it is your turn to critique an oral argument. I imagine you have all seen the headline Fisher v University of Texas (2016) ruling (or at least the concept of affirmative action as it relates to university acceptance). Your assignment is to listen to the oral argument of the attorneys before the court then write a one page double-spaced opinion paper on your impression. Did the attorneys argue their point well? Did one do better than the other? Were they able to get their statement out without being interrupted? Which Justice was dominant? Was it clear from what direction they were asking – conservative? liberal? Did they seem to take sides? Next you are to read the short brief on the oyez site to see exactly what the holding was for the case and which Justices were in the majority or dissent. Was this how you thought they would rule? Finally, look at the background to see what implications this case might have once you have finished writing your paper. ​The oral argument and brief for Fisher v University of Texas, 579 US ____ (2016) can be found at https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-981 . The background and details can be found at http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/fisher-v-university-of-texas-at-austin-2/. Remember, I am looking for your impressions of the workings of the Court, not your opinion on the holding! You should only use the sources given for this assignment. The only source on the submission should be the oral argument for the case itself.

Assignment Instructions

Now it is your turn to critique an oral argument. I imagine you have all seen the headline Fisher v University of Texas (2016) ruling (or at least the concept of affirmative action as it relates to university acceptance). Your assignment is to listen to the oral argument of the attorneys before the court then write a one page double-spaced opinion paper on your impression. Did the attorneys argue their point well? Did one do better than the other? Were they able to get their statement out without being interrupted? Which Justice was dominant? Was it clear from what direction they were asking – conservative? liberal? Did they seem to take sides? Next you are to read the short brief on the oyez site to see exactly what the holding was for the case and which Justices were in the majority or dissent. Was this how you thought they would rule? Finally, look at the background to see what implications this case might have once you have finished writing your paper.

​The oral argument and brief for Fisher v University of Texas, 579 US ____ (2016) can be found athttps://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-981 . The background and details can be found at http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/fisher-v-university-of-texas-at-austin-2/.

Remember, I am looking for your impressions of the workings of the Court, not your opinion on the holding! You should only use the sources given for this assignment. The only source on the submission should be the oral argument for the case itself.

Assignment Instructions Now it is your turn to critique an oral argument. I imagine you have all seen the headline Fisher v University of Texas (2016) ruling (or at least the concept of affirmative action as it relates to university acceptance). Your assignment is to listen to the oral argument of the attorneys before the court then write a one page double-spaced opinion paper on your impression. Did the attorneys argue their point well? Did one do better than the other? Were they able to get their statement out without being interrupted? Which Justice was dominant? Was it clear from what direction they were asking – conservative? liberal? Did they seem to take sides? Next you are to read the short brief on the oyez site to see exactly what the holding was for the case and which Justices were in the majority or dissent. Was this how you thought they would rule? Finally, look at the background to see what implications this case might have once you have finished writing your paper. ​The oral argument and brief for Fisher v University of Texas, 579 US ____ (2016) can be found at https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-981 . The background and details can be found at http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/fisher-v-university-of-texas-at-austin-2/. Remember, I am looking for your impressions of the workings of the Court, not your opinion on the holding! You should only use the sources given for this assignment. The only source on the submission should be the oral argument for the case itself.

Assignment Instructions

Now it is your turn to critique an oral argument. I imagine you have all seen the headline Fisher v University of Texas (2016) ruling (or at least the concept of affirmative action as it relates to university acceptance). Your assignment is to listen to the oral argument of the attorneys before the court then write a one page double-spaced opinion paper on your impression. Did the attorneys argue their point well? Did one do better than the other? Were they able to get their statement out without being interrupted? Which Justice was dominant? Was it clear from what direction they were asking – conservative? liberal? Did they seem to take sides? Next you are to read the short brief on the oyez site to see exactly what the holding was for the case and which Justices were in the majority or dissent. Was this how you thought they would rule? Finally, look at the background to see what implications this case might have once you have finished writing your paper.

​The oral argument and brief for Fisher v University of Texas, 579 US ____ (2016) can be found athttps://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-981 . The background and details can be found at http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/fisher-v-university-of-texas-at-austin-2/.

Remember, I am looking for your impressions of the workings of the Court, not your opinion on the holding! You should only use the sources given for this assignment. The only source on the submission should be the oral argument for the case itself.

STP, PRODUCT MANAGEMENT & SITUATION ANALYSIS

 

 

http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights.html

http://www.experian.com/marketing-services/marketing-services.html

https://www.experian.com/assets/marketing-services/product-sheets/mosaic-usa.pdf

Compare and contrast the theories and work of Frederick Taylor, Max Weber, and Luther Gulick. Tell how these theories impact public administration as we know it today.

Compare and contrast the theories and work of Frederick Taylor, Max Weber, and Luther Gulick. Tell how these theories impact public administration as we know it today.

Include at least two references from the required readings along with two new ones.

You should have no less than four pages of double-spaced work not including the title page and the reference page.

Use in-text citations and an APA formatted reference.

Remember to use academic writing and proofread carefully for spelling and grammar errors.

PRICING & MARKETING PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

KINDLY FIND ATTACHED